<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Centre Flow &#187; GHG emissions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.centreflow.ca/tag/ghg-emissions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.centreflow.ca</link>
	<description>Canadian perspectives on energy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:10:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>CCS Update</title>
		<link>http://www.centreflow.ca/2011/03/08/ccs-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.centreflow.ca/2011/03/08/ccs-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All About Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHG emissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centreflow.ca/?p=13835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Burning fossil fuels results in emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), a greenhouse gas linked to climate change. One of the ways of reducing these emissions is carbon capture and storage. CCS involves, capturing the CO2 at the source – large emitters such as power stations or industrial plants. The CO2 is then trucked or piped<a class="readMoreLink" href="http://www.centreflow.ca/2011/03/08/ccs-update/">Read More...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.centreflow.ca/2011/03/08/ccs-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nuclear Power – It’s the New Black, Again</title>
		<link>http://www.centreflow.ca/2011/02/21/nuclear-power-%e2%80%93-it%e2%80%99s-the-new-black-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.centreflow.ca/2011/02/21/nuclear-power-%e2%80%93-it%e2%80%99s-the-new-black-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 16:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All About Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHG emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear reactors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centreflow.ca/?p=13594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The idea for using nuclear power to generate electricity was still fairly avant-garde in 1953 when President Eisenhower announced his “Atoms for Peace” program. Prior to the program, nuclear research had been primarily focused on weapons. And electricity was mainly fuelled by coal. In 1954, the Russians were the first to go on line with<a class="readMoreLink" href="http://www.centreflow.ca/2011/02/21/nuclear-power-%e2%80%93-it%e2%80%99s-the-new-black-again/">Read More...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.centreflow.ca/2011/02/21/nuclear-power-%e2%80%93-it%e2%80%99s-the-new-black-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cap and Trade: Canada Shouldn’t Wait for the U.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.centreflow.ca/2011/02/17/cap-and-trade-canada-shouldn%e2%80%99t-wait-for-the-u-s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.centreflow.ca/2011/02/17/cap-and-trade-canada-shouldn%e2%80%99t-wait-for-the-u-s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All About Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coast to Coast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap and trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHG emissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centreflow.ca/?p=13533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy (NTREE), because of uncertainty in U.S. climate policy direction, Canada should adopt a phased-in approach to climate harmonization policy with the U.S. Doing so will avoid delay in emissions reductions and maintain economic competitiveness. Parallel Paths: Canada-U.S. Climate Policy Choices, is the third<a class="readMoreLink" href="http://www.centreflow.ca/2011/02/17/cap-and-trade-canada-shouldn%e2%80%99t-wait-for-the-u-s/">Read More...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.centreflow.ca/2011/02/17/cap-and-trade-canada-shouldn%e2%80%99t-wait-for-the-u-s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government Renews Promise on Renewable Fuel</title>
		<link>http://www.centreflow.ca/2011/02/10/government-renews-promise-on-renewable-fuel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.centreflow.ca/2011/02/10/government-renews-promise-on-renewable-fuel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All About Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coast to Coast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bio diesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment Minister]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHG emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heating oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewables]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centreflow.ca/?p=13588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Federal Environment Minister Peter Kent announced today that the Canadian Government is moving ahead with the requirement for an average two per cent renewable content in diesel fuel and heating oil. This announcement was further to one made September 10, 2010 when Jim Prentice, environment minister at the time, publicized the requirement for five per<a class="readMoreLink" href="http://www.centreflow.ca/2011/02/10/government-renews-promise-on-renewable-fuel/">Read More...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.centreflow.ca/2011/02/10/government-renews-promise-on-renewable-fuel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fuel Switching  Part 2: Canada</title>
		<link>http://www.centreflow.ca/2011/01/27/fuel-switching-part-2-canada/</link>
		<comments>http://www.centreflow.ca/2011/01/27/fuel-switching-part-2-canada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All About Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy-efficient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel-efficient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHG emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centreflow.ca/?p=13333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unlike the United States, there are federal government policies aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions in Canada, and they may result in gas to coal fuel switching. On June 23, 2010 the federal government announced regulations regarding the gradual phase-out of inefficient coal-fired generation in Canada in an effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The<a class="readMoreLink" href="http://www.centreflow.ca/2011/01/27/fuel-switching-part-2-canada/">Read More...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.centreflow.ca/2011/01/27/fuel-switching-part-2-canada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fuel Switching  Part 1: United States</title>
		<link>http://www.centreflow.ca/2011/01/26/fuel-switching-part-1-united-states/</link>
		<comments>http://www.centreflow.ca/2011/01/26/fuel-switching-part-1-united-states/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 16:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All About Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel-efficient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHG emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centreflow.ca/?p=13326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coal to natural gas fuel switching the United States is a function of coal prices versus natural gas prices. Coal has historically been the fuel of choice, but the percentage of electricity generated from coal has dropped from 52.1 in 1996 to 44.5 in 2009 while the percentage generated from natural gas has risen to<a class="readMoreLink" href="http://www.centreflow.ca/2011/01/26/fuel-switching-part-1-united-states/">Read More...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.centreflow.ca/2011/01/26/fuel-switching-part-1-united-states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E3 Roundtable Discussion Continues</title>
		<link>http://www.centreflow.ca/2011/01/24/e3-roundtable-discussion-continues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.centreflow.ca/2011/01/24/e3-roundtable-discussion-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All About Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coast to Coast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHG emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydropower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low-carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centreflow.ca/?p=13343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The third of four E3 (energy, environment, economy) Roundtables was held in Calgary January 17th, 2010. Hosted by Corporate Knights magazine and sponsored by Enbridge, the Roundtables “provide for a discussion that will support the development of visionary energy policy options for the whole of Canada.” Central to the discussion was the theme question “Most<a class="readMoreLink" href="http://www.centreflow.ca/2011/01/24/e3-roundtable-discussion-continues/">Read More...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.centreflow.ca/2011/01/24/e3-roundtable-discussion-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NGVs reduce GHGs</title>
		<link>http://www.centreflow.ca/2011/01/18/ngvs-reduce-ghgs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.centreflow.ca/2011/01/18/ngvs-reduce-ghgs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All About Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In Motion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative fuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel-efficient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHG emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centreflow.ca/?p=13294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the future, when you stop for gas, you may actually be stopping for gas, as in natural gas. The Natural Gas Use in Transportation Roundtable, a group comprising representatives from the trucking, automotive and natural gas industries, environmental groups and federal and provincial governments, published its report Natural Gas Use in the Canadian Transportation<a class="readMoreLink" href="http://www.centreflow.ca/2011/01/18/ngvs-reduce-ghgs/">Read More...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.centreflow.ca/2011/01/18/ngvs-reduce-ghgs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Injecting Gas, Cash and Controversy</title>
		<link>http://www.centreflow.ca/2010/12/20/injecting-gas-cash-and-controversy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.centreflow.ca/2010/12/20/injecting-gas-cash-and-controversy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 16:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In Motion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHG emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shale gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unconventional gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centreflow.ca/?p=12318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fuel injection’s a great way to improve the efficiency of an engine, but a cash injection’s nothing to sneeze at either. UBC researcher Steven Rogak is going to be getting the latter to do the former, with a five-year, $499,824 grant from  the federal government in support of his natural-gas-injected-engine research. The project’s goal is<a class="readMoreLink" href="http://www.centreflow.ca/2010/12/20/injecting-gas-cash-and-controversy/">Read More...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.centreflow.ca/2010/12/20/injecting-gas-cash-and-controversy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>M-m-m biomass</title>
		<link>http://www.centreflow.ca/2010/08/26/m-m-m-biomass/</link>
		<comments>http://www.centreflow.ca/2010/08/26/m-m-m-biomass/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Healthy Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biofuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHG emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste-to-energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centreflow.ca/?p=11349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We don’t like generating biofuel from our food, but what about a worker whose food is our waste? That’s exactly what Bristol Robotics Lab in the UK has been doing with a sewage-scavenging robot that metabolizes waste in its artificial gut. The robot, the Ecobot III, can survive by itself for up to seven days<a class="readMoreLink" href="http://www.centreflow.ca/2010/08/26/m-m-m-biomass/">Read More...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.centreflow.ca/2010/08/26/m-m-m-biomass/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Bright Idea: Keeping Things Dim</title>
		<link>http://www.centreflow.ca/2010/07/30/a-bright-idea-keeping-things-dim/</link>
		<comments>http://www.centreflow.ca/2010/07/30/a-bright-idea-keeping-things-dim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All About Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon offsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy saving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHG emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centreflow.ca/?p=11057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since most of us aren’t ready to pack up our belongings and pitch a tent in the middle of the wilderness, the steps we take to reduce our environmental impact tend to be small ones. Government websites like the Office of Energy Efficiency provide a host of energy-saving tips like choosing low-energy lighting fixtures and<a class="readMoreLink" href="http://www.centreflow.ca/2010/07/30/a-bright-idea-keeping-things-dim/">Read More...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.centreflow.ca/2010/07/30/a-bright-idea-keeping-things-dim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Burning Food And Fuel</title>
		<link>http://www.centreflow.ca/2010/07/06/burning-food-and-fuel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.centreflow.ca/2010/07/06/burning-food-and-fuel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Healthy Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHG emissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centreflow.ca/?p=10867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two hungry, hungry sources are responsible for most of the world’s environmental impacts: our mouths and our gas tanks. According to a report prepared for the “International Panel for Sustainable Resource Management,” convened under the United Nations Environment Programme , food and fuel consumption are taking considerable tolls on the environment that include reducing freshwater<a class="readMoreLink" href="http://www.centreflow.ca/2010/07/06/burning-food-and-fuel/">Read More...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.centreflow.ca/2010/07/06/burning-food-and-fuel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polluters Pay To Promote Parallel Projects</title>
		<link>http://www.centreflow.ca/2010/06/28/polluters-pay-to-promote-parallel-projects/</link>
		<comments>http://www.centreflow.ca/2010/06/28/polluters-pay-to-promote-parallel-projects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 21:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All About Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cogeneration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHG emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centreflow.ca/?p=10870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No one’s figured out how to snatch money from thin air, but 30 Alberta companies recently cashed in by doing almost that: reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. From CO2 capturing in Exshaw to solar and wind power installations in 9,000 homes across the province, Alberta’s climate change fund is paying out for the first round<a class="readMoreLink" href="http://www.centreflow.ca/2010/06/28/polluters-pay-to-promote-parallel-projects/">Read More...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.centreflow.ca/2010/06/28/polluters-pay-to-promote-parallel-projects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Go Big Or Go Green Or Both</title>
		<link>http://www.centreflow.ca/2010/05/12/go-big-or-go-green-or-both/</link>
		<comments>http://www.centreflow.ca/2010/05/12/go-big-or-go-green-or-both/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 17:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All About Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHG emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centreflow.ca/?p=10404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As we’ve seen with project like the United Arab Emirates’ Masdar City, there’s something to be said for raising a city’s energy profile with a splashy public display — like any huge public monument, it definitely makes it hard to look the other way. But when it comes to splashy projects, Rio de Janeiro’s got<a class="readMoreLink" href="http://www.centreflow.ca/2010/05/12/go-big-or-go-green-or-both/">Read More...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.centreflow.ca/2010/05/12/go-big-or-go-green-or-both/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>COP15 Day 2</title>
		<link>http://www.centreflow.ca/2009/12/08/cop15-day-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.centreflow.ca/2009/12/08/cop15-day-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All About Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COP15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHG emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centreflow.ca/?p=8522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To make sense of all the information coming out of the COP15 confence in Copenhagen, Flow will be running a series of daily blog entries to keep you up-to-date on the latest news from the largest climate change event in the world. Today is day two of the 12-day conference. Certainly today&#8217;s most talked-about Copenhagen moment was US<a class="readMoreLink" href="http://www.centreflow.ca/2009/12/08/cop15-day-2/">Read More...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.centreflow.ca/2009/12/08/cop15-day-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Going boldly together where few have gone before</title>
		<link>http://www.centreflow.ca/2009/11/30/going-boldly-together-where-few-have-gone-before/</link>
		<comments>http://www.centreflow.ca/2009/11/30/going-boldly-together-where-few-have-gone-before/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All About Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHG emissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centreflow.ca/?p=7606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canada and its 29 partners in the Organization for Economic Cooperation &#38; Development (OECD) are being challenged by the Paris-based body to have the political moxy to put carbon taxes in place. OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurria threw down the gauntlet during a news conference he called to release the Economics of Climate Change Mitigation, an OECD<a class="readMoreLink" href="http://www.centreflow.ca/2009/11/30/going-boldly-together-where-few-have-gone-before/">Read More...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.centreflow.ca/2009/11/30/going-boldly-together-where-few-have-gone-before/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laying it on thick</title>
		<link>http://www.centreflow.ca/2009/10/26/laying-it-on-thick/</link>
		<comments>http://www.centreflow.ca/2009/10/26/laying-it-on-thick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All About Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bitumen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHG emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in-situ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oilsands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centreflow.ca/?p=6396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, you’ve heard about oil sands in a documentary or on the news. You’ve heard, perhaps, in conversation or classroom debates, about its impact on the environment. Perhaps you even know some people who have packed their bags and headed to Alberta to get their own nugget of black gold and share in the wealth.<a class="readMoreLink" href="http://www.centreflow.ca/2009/10/26/laying-it-on-thick/">Read More...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.centreflow.ca/2009/10/26/laying-it-on-thick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ethanol regulations</title>
		<link>http://www.centreflow.ca/2009/08/25/ethanol-regulations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.centreflow.ca/2009/08/25/ethanol-regulations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coast to Coast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biofuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethanol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHG emissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centreflow.ca/?p=5976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are 12 ethanol producers in Canada spanning the country from the Prairie Provinces to Quebec. Doesn’t sound like very many, does it? Maybe not, but these companies are responsible for the production of 1390 million litres a year (MMly) of ethanol.  From the corn-based ethanol plants in Ontario to the wheat and corn plants<a class="readMoreLink" href="http://www.centreflow.ca/2009/08/25/ethanol-regulations/">Read More...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.centreflow.ca/2009/08/25/ethanol-regulations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon offset market boom</title>
		<link>http://www.centreflow.ca/2009/08/24/carbon-offset-market-boom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.centreflow.ca/2009/08/24/carbon-offset-market-boom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All About Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon offset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHG emissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centreflow.ca/?p=5931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In slow economic times, business is booming in the carbon-offset market. Perhaps it’s because the American Clean Energy and Security Act requires greenhouse gas emissions to be reduced 17% by 2020, and 83% by 2050. Voluntary carbon-offset programs have traditionally been available to major companies, corporations and businesses. Essentially, they’re allowed to exceed emission targets<a class="readMoreLink" href="http://www.centreflow.ca/2009/08/24/carbon-offset-market-boom/">Read More...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.centreflow.ca/2009/08/24/carbon-offset-market-boom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The eco-impact of spam mail</title>
		<link>http://www.centreflow.ca/2009/07/21/the-eco-impact-of-spam-mail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.centreflow.ca/2009/07/21/the-eco-impact-of-spam-mail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Quirk E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eco-impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHG emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centreflow.ca/?p=5595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Monty Python was dead wrong: spam is neither lovely, nor wonderful.   Spam e-mail is one of the four horsemen of the e-apocalypse. Who hasn’t received unwanted ads for male “enhancement,” college degrees, or sales in stores located in another time zone? It turns out, spam email isn’t just annoying, but harmful to the environment.<a class="readMoreLink" href="http://www.centreflow.ca/2009/07/21/the-eco-impact-of-spam-mail/">Read More...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.centreflow.ca/2009/07/21/the-eco-impact-of-spam-mail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

